Court Order : ASUU Filed 14 Appeals
The University Teachers' Union has filed a lawsuit against Judge Polycarp Haman's decision of the National Labor Court in Abuja, which ordered teachers to end their seven-month strike. You must return to class.
ASUU lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, presented his argument with 14 reasons.
Falana's complaint to the PUNCH newspaper was accompanied by a request for a postponement of the execution of Judge Polycarp Haman's sentence
The PUNCH newspaper reported that the NIC issued an order from Judge Polycarp Hamann last Wednesday ordering striking university lecturers to return to classrooms pending a decision. Deciding cases filed by the federal government to check the validity of their strike.
The order directed ASUU members to continue work after FG filed a motion through his attorney, Mr James Igwe.
Justin Hamman said that the order was accepted both for the benefit of the state and because of domestic graduates from the 14th. According to him, the strike was bad for public universities that could not enter private universities.
One of the reasons for the lawsuit, filed by the group through its lawyers, is that "the judge was guilty under the law and thus wrongly decided to hear the case against the defendants." He asked for intervention if he knew or had the right to know. acknowledges that the evidence for the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff already exists which will begin after the trial.
The case also contradicted the judge's decision that the strike was an act of violence against students.
Kiran continued, "The judge erred in law when he said the strike violated the rights of Nigerian students and the government that owns the universities."
"Judge is guilty in law and committed injustice in ordering action against defendant without exercising his legal rights" after justice.
"A knowledgeable judge erred in law when he ruled that 'there can be no doubt that the balance of fairness is in favor of the plaintiff/complainant'."
"The trial judge erred in law when he said that there was no undue delay on the part of the defendants in submitting their request to intervene."
“The judge was guilty under law when he said: 'Under Section 17 of the Commercial Disputes Act, Section 18(1)E prohibits a member of the defendant from leaving Rick at the verdict.
Reply with your names and location